Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clara Adler's avatar

I think the most devastating thing about Emil is that he mistakes renunciation for virtue. It reminded me of “The Remains of the Day”, where dignity becomes such an absolute ideal that it devours the very life it was meant to ennoble. There comes a point when restraint ceases to be moral and becomes another form of fear, dressed in impeccable manners. That is the philosophical brilliance of this story. It exposes how "later" is an entire worldview, one in which possibilities are preserved so perfectly that they are never allowed to become realities.

And the recurring figs, the open window, the coat, Tamara, what extraordinary craftsmanship. You have turned ordinary objects into a Greek chorus of regret, proving that the finest prose never shouts. Your prose lets symbols accumulate until they become unbearable.

Andrew George's avatar

Worse than risk-aversion, the worst alibi for deferral is virtue. Figs later, and passion postponed, as if Emil deserves credit for temperance, and Lia needs protection from herself. The irony is that Lia did need some protecting, and Emil needed to indulge, and this was recognized when these things are often recognized: not "later", but "too late".

Exquisite writing.

38 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?